The dynamics of the global political processes (Europe,
Eurasia and the
South-East Asia) is accelerating. New time
brings new responsibilities, obligations and conditions of peaceful coexistence
of the states. Needles to say that historical velocity is growing dramatically
every year. The world has changed since the end of the World War the II and many
positions became less visible. Cooperation through contradiction became new
reality of the modern system of the international relations. Such realism in the
international politics is a recognized tool for the policy of double standards.
Idealism is confronted by practicality and benefits. Moreover, all countries
which are in transitional democracy, and particularly Abkhazia, need to accept
such realism and establish relations with the International Community based on
the mutual benefits. Such benefits have to be achieved only through regional and
inclusive approaches otherwise this process may result in miscalculation of
perspectives and strategies for the future.
In the light of the global democratic movement some former
communist newly independent countries just declared democracy to become a full
member of the International Community. Despite massive human rights violations
and unbelievable increase of corruption worsened by the growth of the organized
crime these countries were intensively supported and such quasi-states based on
the geopolitical interests and political realism had appeared. Unfortunately
these newly democracies while proving their adherence to democracy reflect their
weakness to effectively implement the latter on their regional neighbors or
former friends from the soviet block.
Today’s World is transforming towards a new system of international relations
based on the regional cooperation and development of the common frameworks and
measures to enhance security, stability and economic growth. Without such
cooperation modern countries can hardly correspond to standards of the
globalization and challenges. Indeed one can hardly name a single country which
may absolutely decline reality of the present day and confront the notion that
future world’s growth is in unity and integration of markets and economies.
Sovereignty as it stands for itself does no longer correspond to its notion.
Cooperation and interdependence based on respect of commonly developed and
mutually respected standards is the long-term perspective for global and
regional relations.
Europe is still in transition. Countries of the
former Soviet Block are still in transition too though the prospects for all are
quite encouraging – they are all democratic. Some succeed some are still on the
way. Many are confronting each other trying to detach themselves from the past
and communist heritage. Unfortunately for most of them communist heritage is
still deeply rooted in their public and social administration systems.
Like everywhere in the former
USSR transitional period for
Abkhazia was ignited with the collapse of
Soviet Union. Unfortunately this positive
process of transition was aggravated by severe war with
Georgia. Even more
Abkhazia faced strict blockade and embargo, non-recognition and destroyed
economy and inherited soviet type infrastructures. It is extremely hard to
continue transition and succeed on the way towards democratic reforms and even
to address the needs and requirements of present international political and
economic standards being limited by economic, political and partly information
sanctions. Stagnation within transitional period had isolated the country and
society resulting in inadequate perception of the international economic
processes going around Abkhazia. One of the factors affecting objective
long-term comprehension of the global processes is the isolation of Abkhazia
from the processes in
Europe and The West which lasted for about 100
years. Unambiguous support of the West to
Georgia also forms
Abkhazia’s negative attitude towards the processes of Europesation and
democratization. Isolation and military threat from
Georgia on the one hand and
the expansion of
Europe on the other hand makes some scholars to
believe that in such circumstances Abkhazia should rather be a buffer state. A
state, a divide between expanding NATO and defending
Russia. Such
buffer strategy for Abkhazia is very fragile and old style structure which may
bring a country into a more isolation from the global processes especially
Black Sea cooperation. Buffer states exist
until the superpowers need to be divided. Buffer states can not effectively
implement independent long-term policy since the geopolitics is wide diverse and
flexible. Former enemies may find themselves in another realities. Cooperation
and development of the regional networks does not foreseen the existence of the
buffer states. Buffer state never corresponds to a long-term and stable
development and completely depends on relations between superpowers.
Would be more than impractical to be a
Black Sea countries and exclude each other from
common trade space. Some people believe that globalization and the European
Union expansion is a subjective process which Abkhazia may influence accept or
decline. Whatever the attitude towards the Europe is the
Europe is here. It is almost a year since
common border emerged between Abkhazia and the European Union after
Bulgaria and
Romania joined the EU. It
is time for the European Union and Abkhazia to recognize that both are regional
neighbors. Abkhazia is on the direct European periphery which is not only a
geographic notion but a set of new roles and responsibilities that Abkhazia is
bound to implement in order to gain profits and to be an effective regional
actor.
Abkhazia is gradually getting absorbed into the zone of direct European
interests through the enlargement of the European Union and external European
borders (European Periphery). In this situation European interests in Abkhazia
are becoming more shaped and detailed creating more space to quest for
compromises for EU,
Russia,
Georgia and Abkhazia in
particular.
Currently the EU has no clearly articulated policy towards the de-facto
countries. However issues of security and stability of the European external
borders put Europe in a condition when exclusion of de-facto states from EU
regional policy undermines stability in
Europe. By not recognizing Abkhazia Europe can
not transfer Abkhazia from this geographic point or isolate from it. Abkhazia’s
message to Europe is to be a reliable neighbor to all countries of the region
especially Europe and
Russia which is on its
track towards winter Olympics 2014. While analyzing common interests it becomes
obvious that basic interests of the regional actors like EU,
Russia and Abkhazia are
quite similar.
Idealistically speaking, Black Sea actors implementing regional policy based on
the understanding of the present reality and each others interests would bring a
compromise not only in the conflicts in the Caucasus as well as stability
related issues of the Russian South, European maritime borders and the European
Wider Neighborhood Policy.
One of the common priority for all regional actors is: stability and security on
the wider borders and economic growth what corresponds to the interest of all
actors involved in the Black Sea and
Caucasus regional policy. Unfortunately there
are still some political forces in countries like
Georgia which are
interested in destabilizing situation in the region thus trying to resolve its
internal problems or gain political scores.
Black Sea integration strategy is an ideal
platform for respect of each others interests. The
Black Sea dimension is a tool through which we
can achieve peace and stability. Abkhaz position is independence from
Georgia. Through this
position the basic Abkhaz nation’s interest of self-preservation and
determination is safeguarded. The other vital issue for Abkhazia is
internationally recognized and granted right of repatriation of Abkhaz people
back to motherland. Abkhazia is not a unique country protecting its statehood by
prioritizing the issue of Diaspora’s repatriation like
Israel,
Greece or
Germany. Current EU’s
position in Georgian-Abkhaz conflict is – territorial integrity of
Georgia. Studying this
position through the prism of the European interests it is easy to see simple
desire of the European Union to have less small different independent neighbors
with fragile economy and unstable political system affected by random colored
revolutions on the EU’s periphery. Even at the time of globalization geography
means a lot. The
Europe’s interest is that the EU neighboring
countries would be well governed. Neighbors involved in intensive conflict are
weak and spreading organized crime and trafficking which is a problem for
Europe. In given context
Georgia is such a neighbor
and all sufficient financial and political investments of the European Union
into
Georgia,
Armenia and
Azerbaijan are the reason of
the
Europe’s intention to surround itself with
security and stability as well as implement definite standards of wider
neighborhood. Besides pan European values one of the main elements of the
Euro-neighborhood in the
South Caucasus is strengthening strategic
partnership in the fields of energy. EU is a biggest gas and oil importer and
second energy consumer in the world. EU is bordering the main exporters of
energy like
Russia,
Caspian
Basin, Middle East and
North Africa. EU’s dependency on energy import
had increased up to 80% during decade. Countries the neighbors are playing vital
role in safeguarding secure energy supplies. South Caucasus plays important role
as it is an energy linking route from
Caspian
Basin and Central Asia to
Europe. Besides greater democratic and human
rights dimensions the energy approach describes Europe’s precise interest in
Georgia,
Armenia and
Azerbaijan.
Considering some flexibility of European approaches to conflict resolution there
is a space for more productive mediation and facilitation of the peace
initiatives and negotiations. Regretfully the European Union attitude towards
Abkhazia is based on the Georgian perspective, saying that
Georgia fails to be a
stable EU neighbor because it is territorially disintegrated. Georgian potential
to lobby its interests in American and European political establishments is
greater than Abkhaz what picture the Abkhazia as basic factor undermining
regional stability.
At
the same time
Georgia in the frames of the
“European wider neighborhood policy development program” (such program is
implemented by
Azerbaijan,
Armenia and
Georgia and all Mediterranean
countries except
Turkey –
Turkey is EU candidate) is
also a probable candidate for the EU membership. While accepting Georgia EU will
not build its approach only on political aspects within NATO expansion or
Caspian Oil transit through the South Caucasus or territorial integrity of
Georgia. Expressing common
position towards Abkhazia, the EU and Georgia are driven by different interests.
Though
Georgia’s membership in
the European Union may become reality in the next 15 years European Union is
dealing with more concrete tasks in the field of security on its external
borders.
Secured borders, stable periphery and predictable neighbors (judicial system and
independent courts, economic stability and developed civil society and human
rights protection), corresponding to the European standards are serving for
direct European interests.
When the European Union will see that the recognition of Abkhazia will serve for
stability in the region and will not threaten neighbors then EU’s position
concerning the territorial integrity of Georgia will become more flexible (the
Kosovo case). Indeed independent Abkhazia corresponds to the European interests
rather then Abkhazia incorporated into unstable militarized
Georgia with its
discriminative approach to minorities. It is obvious that return of Abkhazia
into
Georgia could be achieved
only through long lasting military operation which will turn the region into a
much longer economic stagnation. Such prospective are unacceptable for any EU
politicians even those who desperately believes in the peaceful ambitions of
Georgia towards conflicts in
Abkhazia and
South Osetia.
Like the North Cyprus Abkhazia is a direct neighbor for
Europe. Considering that EU lacks tools of
cooperation with de-facto states we can believe that approaches that rendered by
EU to the
North Cyprus could be applicable to Abkhazia.
Realistically speaking this could be most probable scenario for Abkhazia and EU
relations in the next decade. Opening
Black Sea ports for Abkhazia and development of
the trade links between all neighbors would be more than desirable for Abkhazia.
However this process is not a unilateral. To achieve these goals Abkhazia needs
to accept concrete strategy concerning the European Wider Neighborhood policy.
All Black Sea countries are implementing the ENP as well as
Russia. By the way
Russia is the main EU
partner and direct neighboring country.
Russia and EU are
developing cooperation and strategic partnership in four common spheres:
economy, security, education and culture. Russian EU dialog on energy issues is
dominant in these relations.
What Abkhazia may propose to
Europe? By not accepting the ENP strategy
Abkhazia exclude itself from prospective economic cooperation in the region. On
the other hand considering unique geographic and political position Abkhazia may
become vital economic link in the
Black Sea. By accepting common trade economic
and custom standards Abkhazia at unbind and unlimited by the EU obligations in
financial policy could become a unique free economic zone on the EU periphery.
There are countries which don’t have such convenient transport communications to
gain direct access to the European markets while Abkhazia is possessing all
benefits of such neighborhood. The project to implement the Southeast Asian
economy boost in Abkhazia is on the way and may create new economic and
financial center in the
Black Sea. Other countries can hardly implement
such strategy since Bulgaria and Romania are EU, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia,
Moldova and Ukraine are probable candidates and dependants of the conditions and
obligations within Euro-Atlantic memberships.
Turkey and
Russia are developing
independent economy systems and approaches.
To
brake through the blockade and embargo we need to develop and initiate all means
of cooperation between Abkhazia and EU in the frames of common standards and
better governance. We have to give our partners a chance to trade with us
legally. Considering aspiration of
Turkey towards the
European Union Turkey may cut its small scale economic ties with Abkhazia if EU
asks to do so. If Abkhazia does not meet the requirements of neighborhood it
will be affected by even more strict isolation and blockade. Cruisers with
hundreds of thousands of tourists showing up on the lonely horizon will never
enter sea ports of Abkhazia and the number of tourists entering through the
Russian-Abkhaz border will increase up to millions per season jamming people in
long lines under the hot sun. External window for Abkhazia will be of the size
of the border. This will affect the return of repatriates from
Turkey to Abkhazia.
Though Abkhazia has the potential to respond to such challenges there is
mistaken perception that global processes such as the European Union expansion
and the global worming is something happening very far away and not affecting
Abkhazia.
Besides its aspiration to join the
Black Sea economic cooperation Abkhazia in its
turn may serve as regional integration link. More intensive economic integration
with our brother nations of the North Caucasus will preserve stability and serve
for the development of the favorable economic climate and restoration of
communications between North and
South Caucasus. Regional networks should no
longer be isolated. The project of restoring the road to Kabardino-Balkaria over
the Caucasus range could bring revive more intensive trade communication in the
region which serves to interests of all countries. The railroad between
Russia and
Armenia going through
Abkhazia and
Georgia as well as many other
network transnational projects will bring more economy and stability to the
Caucasus. However both of the aforementioned
projects are halted by
Georgia’s
intention to destabilize any of the trade link which may bring incomes to other
neighbors.
Abkhazia’s growth in the frames of the European standards will serve to the
interests of all neighbors and will improve political image of Abkhazia. What
Abkhazia may give to
Europe? It is not a rhetoric question.
Independent Abkhazia is a regional stability factor a link in the revival of the
infrastructure in the
Caucasus. And for sure Abkhazia has no other
option but to be equal regional actor corresponding to the European Standards in
the sake of peaceful and free
Caucasus.
Abkhazia has to undertake a number of constructive steps. To make a preliminary
comparative analyses of the social and economic aspects of life in Abkhazia
which directly relate to implementation of the ENP. Article 49 of the European
Treaty reads that any European state may apply for the European membership after
candidate meets the criteria. Concerning the Abkhazia’s ambition on EU, the
latter should receive clear message that Abkhazia is not aspiring for membership
it is rather going to build its relations with
Europe based on the ENP.
Privileged relations with neighbors are founded on adherence to common values in
the spheres of legal affairs, good governance, human rights protection and
stable developing market economy. Relations between EU an neighbors will depend
on how common these values will be.
None can blame Abkhazia for its aspirations for better standards and economic
stability and indeed such processes will be supported by the International
Community. EU will not provide official action plan for Abkhazia however EU may
give access to its institutions, experience and practices in order to support
the European reforms in de-facto countries like Abkhazia and
North Cyprus.
In
its effort to establish favorable social-economic climate in line with the ENP,
Abkhazia’s choice is to break through – “the Abkhaz Miracle” – example for all
other post crisis countries. This will be a rational reason for the
International Community to recognize Abkhazia’s statehood.
Sukhum - Abkhazia, October 30-31, 2007
Maxim Gunjia
Vice-Foreign Minister of the Republic of Abkhazia